Between 2011 and 2012, incidence of water shortages in Selangor increased by 79%. Syabas is reportedly running on a reserve margin of just 1% with water consumption growing at 3-4% per year. This will adversely affect future economic activities in the Klang Valley, which accounts for 38% of the country’s GDP.
It is also clear that
the governing party in Selangor, which sits as the opposition in the federal
parliament, needs to show it is able to run the state effectively, generate new
jobs and bring in new investments. A recent public criticism by the leader of
the Opposition, of the Chief Minister of Selangor, a senior member of his own
political party, is telling.
While the Chief
Minister has managed Selangor well in the past term, resolving the water issue
is critical for the future of industries and consumers in the state. With this
in mind, there may be opportunities for investors in the sector once the restructuring
takes place.
Credit Suisse recently
issued an excellent report on the Bursa Malaysia-listed companies with exposure
to the water sector. I know the analysts
Danny Goh and Rachel Tan well and therefore, the quality of their work. There
is no need to reinvent the wheels.
Here is a quick summary
table of the financials of three companies in the sector, for those who may not
be able to secure a copy:
Company Price P/E (x) P/BV
(x)
(RM) 2012 2013 2014
Gamuda 4.89 20.3 19.8 14.4 2.8
Puncak 3.25 5.6 4.9 4.2 0.8
KPS 2.00 16.8 n/a n/a 0.9
The Selangor State government has
offered RM9.65 billion to buy all the four water concessionaires in February
2013. It was not successful as Puncak Niaga rejected the offer, while the
others accepted. To succeed, a better offer will have to be made to Puncak
Niaga. Despite the recent rally, Puncak Niaga’s shares
are currently still trading on single digit multiples and below book value.
To be fair, the water restructuring
play has made its rounds many times in the past three years, only to peter out
as talks ended in a stalemate. However, with the general election over and the danger
of dry taps a growing reality, there is palpable sense that a definitive
solution will soon be found.
Turning from water to stationery, I feel
compelled to return to China Stationery Ltd, which I wrote in this column on 5
Oct 2013. There are troubling facts that are inconsistent and not logical, at
least to me.
Below is an extract of the last two
years financial information
China Stationery Ltd
Extracts
of Financial Statements
RMB’000 RMB’000
31 Dec 2012 31 Dec 2011
Cash
and Bank Balances 1,889,491 1,327,077
Borrowings
54,400 49,100
Amount
due to a shareholder 38 71,746
Revenue
1,980,628 1,774,710
Cost
of Sales (1,110,626) (979,207)
Gross
Profit 870,002 795,503
Gross
Margin in % 43.9% 44.8%
Interest
Expense
8,261 41,908
Interest
Income 7,014 5,200
Imputed:
Interest
rate on borrowings 15.2% 34.7%
Interest
rate on deposits 0.37% 0.39%
It raises many
questions, such as:
1) What stationeries are
sold by China Stationery Ltd that generate an astronomical 44% gross margin?
The company makes plastic stationery, plastic tape printer and ink.
2) Why does the company
borrow when it has so much cash?
3) In 2012, the company
paid back RMB 71.7 million to its shareholder. Is this the controlling
shareholder?
4) Why is the total
effective cost of borrowing between 15% and 35%?
5) Why was the company
paying a hefty 57% interest rate, with RMB 38.9 million interest on a RMB 68.5
million convertible bond in 2011?
6) Why are the bank
deposits of some RMB 1.9 billion earning only 0.4% interest when the 1 year
deposit rate in China is over 3%?
In our previous report,
we also indicated that the major shareholder, Lead Champion, has sold down from
71.85% to 23.43% since the beginning of this year.
China Stationery Ltd is
a Bermuda registered company. Its principal place of business is in Fujian
Province, China. It is listed in Malaysia. Its independent auditor is in
Singapore.
The stock price may look
“cheap” now. The cash available per share, accordingly to the financial
statements, is four times more than the stock price. But I believe it may get
“cheaper” soon.
This article will be published in The Edge this weekend.
This article will be published in The Edge this weekend.
CSL is using different jurisdiction to cover up the real picture. Bermuda is used for cover tax and real identity of the owners. As Bursa Malaysia, it welcome all the cow boys companies and is an avenue for legally to 'goreng' and manipulate share price. As for Singapore 'independent' auditor, it don't care due to the business is outside Sg boundary, as long as this jokers provide informations, they will use the best effort to tidy it up, They get fees after all. I don't know why u still keen in CSL? Any specific reason that draw your attention? I only heard it from the market & u. To me, better look for REAL Business to invest.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteOk, get it. U are asking people to sell. If I can short it, my TP is 0. But again, that is not my style of investing and trading
DeleteFor what it's worth - please write to the person in charge of the company Tang Eng Kean , to direct the company to answer these queries.
ReplyDeleteThere may be a rational answer to these illogical financial oddity - I've written in - would other minority shareholder send our regulator a wake up call?
His email is tangengkean (at) bursamalaysia.com
DeleteMr tong , China shares are not good buy as it seems it's more a matter of governance and accounting ..
DeleteRight now those umno counters are in play . Seeing software company going up on anticipation of gst adoption need software so some play emerging starting from censof to ghlsys and now spreading to others